When we make a distinction or identify parts and wholes or identify a relationship, we are always doing so from one particular perspective, made up of the point from which we are viewing and the thing or things in view. P is for looking at things from different perspectives. We connect, interconnect, associate and join. We live in an infinite network of interactions, including between our own thoughts, feelings, and motivations. Fundamentally, relationships are action and reaction.
![m-audio axiom 25 software download m-audio axiom 25 software download](https://media.guitarcenter.com/is/image/MMGS7/Axiom-Air-25-Key-MIDI-Controller/000000113408907-00-2000x2000.jpg)
Relationships include causal, correlation, feedback, inputs/outputs, influence, etc. We can’t understand much about anything without understanding the relationships between or among the ideas or components. R is for identifying relationships between and among ideas. We group, we sort, we classify, we assemble. We split things up or lump them together in systems of context.
![m-audio axiom 25 software download m-audio axiom 25 software download](https://b93cd8a448dc3eb0c358-a784f0287de17aca81e7ecc053e60785.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/826/images/AxiomPro61top.jpg)
We construct meaning when we organize different ideas into part-whole configurations. Every e-mail contains words which contain letters which are made up of pixels. Every thing is a system because it contains parts. S is for organizing ideas into systems of parts and wholes. We identify boundaries, what’s inside and what’s outside. We can make distinctions between different customers, different costs, different sales channels, different suppliers, different employees. Systems thinkers make distinctions between different things and different ideas. The rules are captured in the acronym DSRP.ĭ is for Distinctions. Four simple rules of systems thinking produce better mental models.īy following 4 simple rules, over and over again, anyone can become a practiced and adept systems thinker. None are perfect representations of reality, but they help us when they are better representations of reality.
![m-audio axiom 25 software download m-audio axiom 25 software download](https://medias.audiofanzine.com/images/normal/m-audio-axiom-25-1602556.jpg)
The products of systems thinking are mental models. This description is actually a mental model of a complex adaptive system. Systems thinking defines complex adaptive systems in this way:Īutonomous agents follow simple rules based on what’s happening locally around them, the collective dynamics of which lead to the emergence of the complex dynamics we see. Systems thinking is better thinking (and Austrian economics fully embraces complex adaptive thinking - what Mises called constant flux and Hayek called spontaneous order and Lachmann called the market as a process of combination and recombination). Our mantra at Economics for Business is Think Better, Think Austrian. Systems thinking aligns with how the real world works. The solution is systems thinking - the thinking of complex adaptive systems. This way of thinking is not well-aligned with the realities around us.
![m-audio axiom 25 software download m-audio axiom 25 software download](https://music2home.com/pub/media/catalog/product/cache/74c1057f7991b4edb2bc7bdaa94de933/a/x/axiomair25_back.jpg)
The problems include reductionism (we’re taught to think about parts of systems instead of the system as a whole) hierarchical organization of thinking (versus complex distributed networks) thinking in categories versus breaking down part-whole groupings thinking in terms of liner cause-and-effect versus webs of causality and the prevalence of bivalent logic (right/wrong, black/white) rather than the multi-valent logic of many right answers. Laura and Derek Cabrera have conducted deep research in the field of business thinking, and they’ve identified both the problems and the solution. Key Takeaways and Actionable Insights There’s a crisis in thinking in the business world.